corruption ends.

Accountability, evidenced.

Case study patterns

Why the revolving door raises concerns

Launch library · evergreen read

Photo: Charles Mix courthouse 1st floor pillar 1 by Ammodramus (CC0), via Openverse

The revolving door describes the movement of individuals between senior roles in government and roles in industries that government regulates, sometimes moving in one direction and sometimes both. The concern is not that movement between sectors is inherently wrong, but that it can quietly shape decisions made while still in public office.

A regulator who hopes for a lucrative role in the industry they oversee after leaving public service may, consciously or not, soften decisions that would otherwise damage that future prospect. Equally, an industry figure moving into a regulatory role may carry assumptions and loyalties shaped by their previous employer into decisions meant to be impartial.

Common safeguards include cooling-off periods that delay a former official from working for a company they recently regulated, and post-employment disclosure requirements that make these moves visible to the public. Neither safeguard eliminates the underlying concern entirely, but both reduce the more obvious opportunities for a conflict to quietly form.

Back to the library

Share

Sharing opens the network in a new tab. No tracking scripts are loaded on this page.

Printed from corruption ends.. Sources for this article are listed at the end of the page.