corruption ends.

Accountability, evidenced.

Corporate governance

Why related party transactions need disclosure

Launch library · evergreen read

Photo: "Pillars of Hercules", Niagara Street, Buffalo, New York - 20190715 by Andre Carrotflower (CC BY-SA 4.0), via Openverse

A related party transaction is a deal between a company and someone connected to it, such as a director, a senior executive, or a business they personally control. These transactions are not automatically improper, but they carry an obvious risk that the terms may favour the connected party rather than the company itself.

Disclosure requirements exist so that shareholders and regulators can see these transactions clearly rather than have them buried among ordinary business dealings. Many jurisdictions also require larger related party transactions to be approved by independent directors, or in some cases put directly to a shareholder vote, precisely because the conflicted party cannot reasonably assess their own deal with any real objectivity.

Consistent, careful disclosure builds a track record that protects the company as much as it protects outside investors, since a related party transaction handled openly rarely raises suspicion later. It is usually the transaction that was quietly hidden, rather than the one properly disclosed and approved, that ends up doing lasting reputational damage.

Back to the library

Share

Sharing opens the network in a new tab. No tracking scripts are loaded on this page.

Printed from corruption ends.. Sources for this article are listed at the end of the page.