corruption ends.

Accountability, evidenced.

Corporate governance

Why non-executive directors add scrutiny

Launch library · evergreen read

Photo: "Pillars of Hercules", Niagara Street, Buffalo, New York - 20190715 by Andre Carrotflower (CC BY-SA 4.0), via Openverse

A non-executive director sits on a company's board without also holding a day to day management role within the business, which gives them a degree of distance that makes it easier to question decisions made by the executive team without the natural bias of having personally championed those decisions in the first place.

Effective non-executive directors bring outside experience and are expected to challenge management constructively, particularly on matters such as strategy, risk and executive pay, where an insider's judgement can become clouded by proximity to the day to day pressures and relationships involved in running the business.

The value of a non-executive director depends heavily on their willingness to actually use that independence, since a board full of non-executives who defer consistently to management offers little more genuine scrutiny than a board with no independent directors at all. Structural independence still requires personal courage to become genuinely meaningful, particularly once the stakes have genuinely started to rise.

Back to the library

Share

Sharing opens the network in a new tab. No tracking scripts are loaded on this page.

Printed from corruption ends.. Sources for this article are listed at the end of the page.