corruption ends.

Accountability, evidenced.

Transparency tools

Understanding open contracting standards

Launch library · evergreen read

Photo: Pillars of State (30466012425) by Michael Coghlan from Adelaide, Australia (CC BY-SA 2.0), via Openverse

Open contracting standards set out a consistent format for publishing procurement data, covering the full lifecycle of a contract from initial planning through tender, award and eventual completion. Using a shared, standardised format makes it far easier to compare data across different agencies or even across different countries entirely.

Before these standards existed, procurement data was often published inconsistently, if it was published at all, making meaningful comparison and analysis genuinely difficult even for a determined researcher. A shared standard means a dataset from one government agency can be compared directly against another using exactly the same structure and terminology.

Adopting open contracting standards also tends to improve an agency's own internal data quality, since publishing information in a consistent, structured format naturally exposes gaps and inconsistencies that a purely internal, less visible record keeping system might otherwise allow to persist quietly for years without ever being noticed, even when nobody is watching closely enough to notice.

Back to the library

Share

Sharing opens the network in a new tab. No tracking scripts are loaded on this page.

Printed from corruption ends.. Sources for this article are listed at the end of the page.