corruption ends.

Accountability, evidenced.

Whistleblowing safely

How organisations should acknowledge a report

Launch library · evergreen read

Photo: Courthouse Square as seen from Court Street Bridge, Owego, New York - 20220206 by Andre Carrotflower (CC BY-SA 4.0), via Openverse

Acknowledging a disclosure promptly, even briefly, matters enormously to a reporter who has likely spent considerable time weighing whether to come forward at all. A simple, timely acknowledgement confirming the report was received and explaining the general next steps reduces anxiety and signals that the concern is genuinely being taken seriously.

Good practice generally includes confirming what will happen next, roughly how long the process might take, and who the reporter can contact with a further question, without necessarily revealing details that could compromise the investigation or, more importantly, the reporter's own safety and confidentiality throughout the process.

Organisations that acknowledge reports poorly, through silence, unnecessary delay or a dismissive tone, risk discouraging future reports regardless of how well the underlying investigation is actually conducted. The very first response often shapes whether a reporter, or anyone who later hears about their experience, trusts the process enough to use it themselves.

Back to the library

Share

Sharing opens the network in a new tab. No tracking scripts are loaded on this page.

Printed from corruption ends.. Sources for this article are listed at the end of the page.