corruption ends.

Accountability, evidenced.

Global standards

How corruption perception indexes are built

Launch library · evergreen read

Photo: Lyon County Courthouse Historic Monument by DrTh0r (CC BY-SA 3.0), via Openverse

A corruption perception index combines survey data and expert assessments from multiple independent sources into a single comparative score, ranking countries against one another on perceived levels of public sector corruption. The word perception matters, since these indexes measure how corrupt a country is seen to be rather than measuring corruption directly.

Because corrupt transactions are deliberately hidden, there is no reliable way to count them directly, which is why perception, drawn from business surveys, expert panels and risk analysts, becomes the practical substitute researchers rely on. Combining several independent sources is meant to smooth out the bias any single source might carry on its own.

Critics point out that perception can lag reality, sometimes reflecting old scandals long after genuine reforms have taken hold, or reflecting media coverage more than underlying conditions. Even so, these indexes remain widely used because they offer a rare, consistent way to compare countries over time using the same broad method each year.

Back to the library

Share

Sharing opens the network in a new tab. No tracking scripts are loaded on this page.

Printed from corruption ends.. Sources for this article are listed at the end of the page.